But with growing domestic concerns over energy prices and human-induced climate change, the appointments to TVA’s board could signal what a President John McCain or a President Barack Obama believes about the future of America’s energy and environment.
The Evolution of TVA
As a benefactor and beneficiary of the region’s natural resources, TVA stands at the crossroads of the energy-environment debate. That’s because the company not only produces power for its customers but also manages the lakes, rivers and lands impacted by its decisions while ensuring economic development for the region.
“TVA is, of course, the major power producer in the Tennessee Valley and it generates power by means of coal, nuclear power, [hydro]electricity, a little bit of natural gas, and a little bit of green power nowadays,” said John Nolt, professor of philosophy at the University of Tennessee, where he teaches environmental ethics. “But, also, TVA is the region’s largest steward of public lands, except perhaps for the national parks.”
Following the damming of the rivers in the 1930s and 1940s, those stewardship duties were made considerably more difficult by TVA’s decision to produce energy from coal.
Tracked into TVA’s house by the boots of World War II, the coal decision led a company famous the world over for job creation, resource management and cheap, clean power — possibly the original green company — to more dubious honors. TVA became the nation’s largest air polluter, contributing to the erosion it was created to prevent, and devastated Appalachian communities with strip-mining.
"It quickly turned to being basically an electric utility with the stated mandate of delivering electric power at the lowest possible cost," says William Chandler, a Washington, D.C.-based expert in international development, energy and environmental policy.
To get the coal at the cheapest price and continue to fuel post-war energy demand, TVA bought coal from companies engaged in strip-mining, a highly mechanized means of retrieving coal near the surface.

“In the ‘60s there was a lot of shifts in the coal mining industry, going from underground mining to surface mining activities,” said Roger Bollinger, TVA’s program manager for land reclamation in the 1980s, who now volunteers his time at TVA’s welcome center at Norris Dam. “During that period there were no laws, really, to require reclamation,” or restoring the land when the mining was finished.
Due in part to lower labor costs, this type of coal is much cheaper than coal from underground mining. But it tears up the mountains with trenches and scars that never mend and employs far fewer people in the process.
Marie Cirillo, a former nun who over 40 years ago left the convent to pursue work as a community developer in Appalachia, witnessed first-hand the devastation of strip-mining.
"I remember a big part of the story was that when TVA had originally come in here to put the dams up, it was to stop a lot of the erosion," recalled Cirillo. "But then, when they didn't have enough water utility energy, they went into coal. And because strip-mining was the cheapest coal, they were the prime buyers of strip-mined coal.”
Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next

Print
Email
Bookmark
